Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?
It is alarming that the recidivism rate is increasing nowadays. This essay will explain the underlying factors that give rise to this phenomenon and point out some proactive measures to solve the issue.
Currently, our justice system does not provide enough vocational courses for prisoners. In particular, being in prison for a long time without any self-development while lacking necessary tools, it is impossible for them to secure meaningful employment after being released. They can not financially support their children, their family and theft, to them, is a must to survive. Public stigmatization is also another factor making the matter worse. Instead of happily welcoming ex-detainees re-integrate the community after serving their first punishment. The locals, even family members tend to mock or isolate them, this breeds negative thoughts in their mind and directly forces ex-convicts to gather again with criminal groups, and recommitting crimes will be an unavoidable result.
One possible response to reduce the recidivism rate in society is offering more courses. By mentally and physically preparing, they will be no longer worried about finding jobs to meet their needs. More importantly, the government should raise people’s awareness of this issue by introducing a ban against stigmatization. People need to feel sympathetic for their backgrounds, and forgiving the past is necessary for successful rehabilitation. If society holds their mistakes for a long time, they will push people to criminal life again because we denied all of their opportunities.
While recidivism is rising at a significant rate, as long as we identify the causes, including lack of working skills and public boycott, and give out feasible solutions, the problem can be solved
(273 words) - 50 minutes
It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments, such as South pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, scientists and tourists are able to travel to isolated natural areas.When weighing the pros and cons of this development, my position is that while it has specific drawbacks, the positives are far more significant.
In fact, my position on this development that traveling to certain remote destinations with extreme environments such as the South pole or the Amazon forest could be potentially harmful to both travelers and scientists. The threats posed by unknown bacteria or dangerous animals are always ready to harm unprepared travelers or those who do not follow safety procedures. Furthermore, a specific number of untouched places have been threatened and irreversibly damaged by wastes left by visitors. In particular, a recent study from Harvard University revealed that garbage accumulation over years has contaminated groundwater in 118 caves in Vietnam.
However, my claim is that with huge advantages offered to humans when scientists and tourists are now able to approach isolated areas, these absolutely outweigh the mentioned disadvantages. Certainly, the tourism industry has revived after years of dismalness since travelers were bored of sightseeing in many cities, skyscrapers, or malls all the time. The unique natural phenomenon such as the giant icebergs of the South pole or the picturesque atmosphere in the Amazon forest has amazed tourists over the world and offered them exclusive travel experiences. Not to mention, by allowing scientists to visit these pristine areas, they have done numerous research, and needless to say, countless of the most fatal virus strains would be found. As a result, with valuable knowledge obtained from these trips, our understanding of nature can be expanded further,and this will protect humans from another pandemic in the future.
From my perspective, the benefits of this trend have overshadowed its disadvantages since it has both flourished our tourism industry and broadened our knowledge about Mother Earth. As such, I reaffirm that encouraging both tourists and scientists to land in these places is for the sake of humanity