Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thế h 1 chỗ đầy enemies ngang sức, với 1 chỗ chả có ai canh, phá cái nào trước? Bọn Chính phủ có thể huy động ngay lực lượng vào thành phố xử cái tàu trong khi Sịp đi phá cái engine là chuẩn mẹ rồi, bới lông tìm vết vãi.Lois: Really? You’re going to try to destroy the one located harmlessly in the Indian ocean… over the one that’s the middle of the largest, most densely populated city in North America?
Cái scoutship 18k năm có cái buồng tạo phôi chứ làm sao có phôi em bé nào trong đấy được, lấy cái gì ra mà tạo với chả nuôi...Zod: Hey, remember when you blew up that ship with all the tree pod babies? You committed genocide!
Thằng viết bài chả biết gì về Phantom Zone với cả mạch phim lúc đấy.Guard #1: General Zod, you are under arrest for treason and for asking too many questions about our ridiculous society. You will be put in prison with your minions, which means you will be the only people who will survive Krypton blowing up. Also when Krypton blows up it’ll set you all free.
.đọc ko thấy funny mà để emo funny làm gì nhỉ,thấy bài viết này ở bển được yêu thích comment mấy trăm cái,post bên đây nhìn chúng ít người thích thú,có vẻ sense of humor của dân Việt mình khác Mĩnói chung càng đọc càng thấy độ bơi móc như đàn bà của thằng viết bài chứ chả thấy funny mẹ gì.


ai cho mình xin cái hình động dân mẽo chế superman đấm iron man trên không đi, chế từ cảnh sup đấm Zod ở cuối trailer 3 ấy. tìm mãi không ra

Cái bài ost mà mỗi cảnh hồi tưởng buồn buồn nó phát là bài tên gì nhỉ , nghe giai điệu đơn giản nhưng chả hiểu sao lại thích![]()
Nó nói cũng đúng rồi còn gì, ông già Clark đúng là douche bag khi bảo superman kệ mịa bọn con nít đi, nhưng lại muốn Clark cứu con chó già![]()
ngay dưới thấy có thằng độp lại ngay cmt :rofl:The Harsh Utilitarianism of Man of Steel's Pa Kent
Adam Ozimek, Contributor
![]()
Jonathan and Martha Kent as they appear in "New Earth" continuity, with a young Clark. Cover to Superman: Secret Origin #1 by Gary Frank. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
As a warning this post is about the new Man of Steel film and will be filled with spoilers.
The new Superman film Man of Steel contains a character with cold utilitarian principles that comes as a slight surprise. No, it is not any of the Kryptonians in the film, but Jonathan Kent, Superman’s adoptive father. From the beginning Jonathan urges young Clark to work hard to preserve his secret. His fear is that people will fear him and the government will come to take him away. That he fears and emphasizes this throughout Clark’s life is not surprising, but he is not primarily afraid of losing an adoptive son but of the future losing a hero who could save many lives. In short, his calculus is not selfish fear of losing his son or even fear for his son’s own safety, but an understanding of the net loss of welfare over time that would be lost by Clark revealing his powers before the world is ready.
Perhaps you are skeptical and think Jonathan Kent merely wishes to not lose his son, and you couldn’t be blamed for not taking Pa Kent’s utilitarian rhetoric seriously. But on two occasions he really shows he means it, and does so in the kind of harsh utilitarian way that is usually reserved for the bad guy or at least an alien in a film. First is when young Clark saves a schoolbus full of his classmates. This has placed Clark in something of a trolley problem: allow the children in front of him to die to possibly save many more people in the future, or save them and risk that he will be exposed and will never be able to save so man in the future as Superman. Jonathan Kent suggests that perhaps Clark should have embraced the cold, calculating utilitarian position:
Jonathan Kent: You have to keep this side of yourself a secret.
Clark Kent: What was I supposed to do? Let them die?
Jonathan Kent: Maybe…
This is technically not a “yes”, but it is pretty close. And quite frankly the way Kevin Costner delivered the “maybe” it sounded a lot like an implied “yes” to me. And his even considering that letting the children die was best is far more utilitarian of a sentiment than you’re likely to see out of a non-alien, non-bad guy in a movie.
Later, Pa Kent’s utilitarianism is put to an even greater test, and in this time he does not waiver. All three Kents are caught in their car in a tornado and Martha and Clark wait under an overpass with a crowd of people as Jonathan rushes back out onto the highway to save the family dog who was left in the car (don’t worry, the dog makes it). Jonathan gets momentarily caught and is left standing there with the tornado about to bear down upon him. He and Clark look at each other and Clark indicates he is going to rush out to save him, but Jonathan motions to him to stop with his hand and allows himself to be swallowed by the tornado. He gives his own life to protect Clark’s secret. Not to keep Clark safe for his own good, but for the sake of the people he will save in the future.
So Jonathan Kent is such a cold calculating utilitarian that he would allow a schoolbus full of children to drown and sacrifice his own life for the probability of saving future lives. I applaud his utilitarian calculations. Movies tend to celebrate characters who refuse to accept utilitarian tradeoffs and say “no, I won’t let anyone die”. The utilitarians are bad guys or cold, unfeeling aliens. But Jonathan Kent thinks probabilistically and consequentially, and he’s weighing the net present value of welfare.
Mr. Ozimek,
I believe that you misunderstand the nature of Mr. Kent’s concern. Superman is an illegal immigrant. He was not born in the United States and entered without the appropriate legal documents or through authorized channels. Neither of his birth parents are United States citizens so he has no right to reside in the United States. Further, he used numerous government services (such as his public education) to which neither he nor his birth parents contributed any taxes.
Mr. Kent’s concern was that he might be identified as someone harboring an illegal immigrant and could face both jail time and fines for his felonies. This movie is nothing more than continued liberal celebration and encouragement of illegal immigration. Superman needs to be deported.
- vì lo cho thằng con và gia đình bị bất lợi nên mới bảo nó hạn chế cứu người trước khi thời điểm thích hợp tới thôi, chứ làm gì sẵn sàng hi sinh cái chết của 1 nhóm nhỏ để thằng con sau này có thể cứu cả Trái đất..
à đó là bài what are...........world ? (bài này cảnh cuối pa Kent nhìn con mà mình rớt nc mắt luôn). bài này đầy đủ các đoạn như bạn nói đấy, cái tiếng piano nghe nhẹ nhẹ chứ gì :). bài good bye my son với cảnh chia tay con zai cũng rơm rớm, đoạn đấy nghe nổi da gà, bài này nghe bi thương vãiNghe bài này phê quá các bác ợ
[video=youtube;_Quv7rOw_tQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Quv7rOw_tQ[/video]
Cái bài ost mà mỗi cảnh hồi tưởng buồn buồn nó phát là bài tên gì nhỉ , nghe giai điệu đơn giản nhưng chả hiểu sao lại thích![]()

Cái cách mà nhìn thấy và vỗ tay ở phim là kĩ xảo, nhạc nhẽo, cháy nổ, và tàn phá. Cái chất hero không thấy đâu."I guess what I'm saying isn't so much an opinion on the Man of Steel. It's more about the way superhero movies have become... at the end of all of these movies, all I'm seeing is fire and death. And that confuses the living shit out of me, because everybody's going to these movies and they're all making so much money. And at the end, a hero stands tall as all of society crumbles behind him. That isn't a superhero to me, a guy who stands there when everyone else is dead. That's like a rock star. I don't want to see movies about rock stars. Put the hero back in the super hero movies, because I think 'super' might have taken over."
nói chung phim này đáng ra rạp, đáng xem trong hè. Nhưng kịch bản thì ngu ngốc , đầy plot hole như mấy cái phim của đạo diễn thần thánh siêu phàm vô địch vô đối nolan
