bộ đồ thằng cọ vú họa tiết đẹp vãi
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sao lại gọi nó là cọ vú,Ko hiểu lắmbộ đồ thằng cọ vú họa tiết đẹp vãi
treo cổ hết bọn nào ghép chung 2 anh 
Ủa sao tưởng anh trai ? Thấy phim dịch vậy màGin đã bỏ Hela theo mụ nửa đêmmụ lại còn có chồng

hết tuần này tỉ 6 rồi patuần sau deadpool ra rạp rồi
mới đc có 1 tỉ 2
flop cmnr![]()

Disclaimer: This discussion is going to be filled with spoilers and EXTREMELY pretentious. Apologies for both.
So despite being a teacher for the last decade, I was never a very good student. I fell asleep in class on a regular basis and procrastinated on assignments more often than not. As a result, a lot of college is a blur, but one thing that did burrow into my brain is Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave”; most specifically how it related to his idea of “forms.”
Essentially, Plato argues that physical forms are just flawed representations of perfect ideas. For example, if you try to imagine the most beautiful tree possible, no actual tree could possibly match the perfection in your head. It would have defects, or things that make it less beautiful to some, and more beautiful to others. Others might not even agree that it is a tree.
Plato argued that what we see in our reality is more like a shadow on the wall of a cave, with the perfect “tree” being outside in the light (aka, the divine truth). Only the Gods, and some philosophers, could possibly grasp the concept of real “truth.”
The important part is the concept that a thing is not made up of just physical matter, but by the IDEA of it. Its philosophical essence, if you will.
So here’s where Infinity War’s most under-discussed “plot hole” comes in...
SPOILERS IF YOU STILL HAVEN’T SEEN AVENGERS 3!!!
At the end of the film, to the shock of many an audience, Thanos wins. He uses the Infinity Stones to wipe out half of all life in the universe, including most of our beloved superheroes.
But, let me ask you this: why did their clothes evaporate too?
It is abundantly clear that Thanos is not burning the life forms away (he says it will be painless and they all maintain their original color, even in dust form). One might assume he is taking them apart one atom at a time and scattering them to the wind. Regardless of how it works, we are told that he is wiping out all life. Not STUFF. Life. Living things.
We know he did not erase living things and all their possessions because Nick Fury’s pager is still in tact, as is the car of the person who was driving in front of him. So either this is a huge plot hole that the writers overlooked or chose to ignore for the sake of drama, OR, as I choose to think of it, things got a little Platonic in the writer’s room.
Here’s my theory. But first, an experiment.
Picture Donald Duck waddling down the street.
Seriously, do it. I’ll wait…
Did you imagine him naked? Ofcourse not. You pictured his weird little sailor outfit. He doesn’t wear that in EVERY cartoon, and in fact sometimes he is full on naked, but your IDEA of Donald Duck included his outfit. For most conscious life in our universe, Donald Duck includes the little hat and shirt (but NEVER pants).
So when Thanos initiated the “Snapture” (props to Glen Weldon over at NPR for that one), he doesn’t just wipe out half the life in the universe. He uses the Infinity Gauntlet to erase your true essence: the very concept of what made you who or what you were. The pure intellectual concept of the person. For example, Nick Fury is, in most people’s eyes, a black guy in a trench coat with an eye patch. All that’s gone. Bucky has a metal arm in most people’s realities. The arm goes with him.
He didn’t just kill Spiderman. He erased him from the eyes of the Gods themselves, Spidey suit and all. In Magic the Gathering terms, he didn’t send them to the graveyard. He removed them from the freaking game. No shadow on the cave wall, and no tree outside. Total Platonic Reversal.
Or I’m overthinking all of this, but where’s the fun in that. :-)

)Ra phim gần nhau quá cũng có vấn đềNếu như cái cách Peter Parker tan biến trong vòng tay của Tony Stark khiến cho người xem thương tiếc và bồi hồi, thì ngược lại cách hóa thành tro bụi trước đôi mắt kinh hoàng của Okoye lại chỉ làm khán giả cảm thấy: "Meh, chỉ thế thôi sao?"
Hai biên kịch chính của phim là Stephen McFeely và Christopher Markus lên tiếng thừa nhận việc này phần nhiều là do họ không dự tính được Black Panther sẽ thành công đến như vậy. McFeely nói: "Xin hãy nhớ là vào thời điểm chúng tôi viết kịch bản và bắt đầu quay IW, thì dự án Black Panther vẫn chưa chính thức thành hình. Chúng tôi không biết rằng nó sẽ rất tuyệt vời và tạo sự đồng cảm lớn đến vậy." Thế nên hãng phim không có nhiều thời gian để tăng cường vai trò của Black Panther và biến cái chết của anh trở nên có cảm xúc hơn.
