Hallo everybody!!

[changtrailuumanh]

I think it's about 4-5 milions VND, it could be a little more or less depends on the time you search for it.

 

[Dark Magick]

lolz 4-5 mil for an ex Def 17 years old??? you are little joker.

 

[TheGuardian]

any one help me player's price

i need a 17 year old player who has excellent defend skill ( that's all)
but i dont know his price

Well, the right price is about 350.000 EUR but I don't know how much is it in VND... ::(

/TheGuardian

 

[holyunicorn]

1000 dong* = 100 US$ so they changtrailuumanh mean 400K-500K US$ for that players. Euro is £ or US$??

 

[changtrailuumanh]

Euro is €, but in hattrick it has the same value as USD ($), which is 10 times the value of VND (1£ = 10VND).

 

[TheGuardian]

Euro is £, but in hattrick it has the same value as USD ($), which is 10 times the value of VND (1£ = 10VND).

Euro symbol is €

£= english sterling
$= U.S. dollars
€= Euro

I agree that in Hattrick 1 Euro = 1 USD

::)

/TheGuardian

 

[holyunicorn]

I have some tactical question:
_should I use AIM when my wing attack better and AOW when middle attack better?
_a more experience scorer can score most of their chance (excellent scoring and experience) and a better score can give me better attack so more chance (outstanding and inadequate experience), who should I use?? My opponent have very good defense so the better scorer can't make my attack better even I play 3-5-2, I will use 4-5-1 to stop his CA. How do u think about this plan??

 

[TheGuardian]

I have some tactical question:
_should I use AIM when my wing attack better and AOW when middle attack better?

No, my opinion is that You have to play AOW when You have higher side attack ratings, and AIM when You have higher central attack ratings... ::)

a more experience scorer can score most of their chance (excellent scoring and experience) and a better score can give me better attack so more chance (outstanding and inadequate experience), who should I use??

No doubts about this: if they have same form, use always the player with the higher skill (in this case, let's use the outstanding scorer).
Êxperience is a good way to chôose between players with similar skills... If I have two outstanding scorers, with same passing and same form, I will choose the one with more experience...

My opponent have very good defense so the better scorer can't make my attack better even I play 3-5-2, I will use 4-5-1 to stop his CA. How do u think about this plan??

Always remember that usually You need a 3-4 level higher defense to stop an attack. So, to stop a very low solid attack, You will need at least a very high solid (or better a very low excellent) defense...

For Your match I would try to have as much as possession ít's possible, hope Your lower attack is not low enough not to score...
My humble opinion? A 3-5-2 with a winger TM and another winger offensive could be the better choice...

Good luck!!
:wink:

/TheGuardian

 

[dream2]

Jorge Carvão (70693038)
18 years, weak form, healthy
A pleasant guy who is balanced and upright.
Has disastrous experience and weak leadership abilities.


Nationality: Portugal
Total Skill Index (TSI): 900
Wage: 1 032 US$/week including 20% Bonus
Owner: VINABOZS
Warnings: 0
Injuries: Healthy


Stamina: inadequate Goalkeeping: disastrous
Playmaking: wretched Passing: poor
Winger: excellent Defending: weak
Scoring: poor Set Pieces: weak

How much wuold him cost now if i plan to sell him?

 

[TTVNonline]

No doubts about this: if they have same form, use always the player with the higher skill (in this case, let's use the outstanding scorer).
Êxperience is a good way to chôose between players with similar skills... If I have two outstanding scorers, with same passing and same form, I will choose the one with more experience...

I think so.

No, my opinion is that You have to play AOW when You have higher side attack ratings, and AIM when You have higher central attack ratings...

So, if your opponent have a poor++ wing defence and a passably - middle. You have innadequate - wing attack and innadequate + middle. what is suitable tactic??

And what is the team better?? The team with balance formation or the team with a dominant line (examble : middle or attack)

 

[TheGuardian]

Jorge Carvão (70693038)

Stamina: inadequate Goalkeeping: disastrous
Playmaking: wretched Passing: poor
Winger: excellent Defending: weak
Scoring: poor Set Pieces: weak

How much wuold him cost now if i plan to sell him?

Well I think about 100.000 € (euro)...

Still didn't understand how many dongs it is... :'>

/TheGuardian

 

[TheGuardian]

So, if your opponent have a poor++ wing defence and a passably - middle. You have innadequate - wing attack and innadequate + middle. what is suitable tactic??
And what is the team better?? The team with balance formation or the team with a dominant line (examble : middle or attack)

With that kind of ratings, the team that attacks (if he has strong team confidence) has a lot of chances of scoring both on the side and in the middle... ::)
So the most suitable tactic, in my humble opinion, is a 3-5-2 with both offensive winger (if both sides attack/defense rating are equal). Of course if this gives You anyway the ball possession, or else You will need a wing TM to boost the midfield and win posession, hoping that Your chance opportunities don't go on the side where You have the winger TM).

My opinion is that, in the example You made, the attacking team is far better
than the defending team. A very equilibrated team always pays in Hattrick...

/TheGuardian

 

[changtrailuumanh]

well 100.000 euros just simply equal to 1.000.000 dong (multiplied the euros by 10 to get the dongs)

Ok I have a question, if a balanced team with weaker midfield has to go against another not-so-balanced team with stronger midfield, then what should that team do, putting wingers TW and losing wing attack but will gain more possession? or else?

 

[TheGuardian]

well 100.000 euros just simply equal to 1.000.000 dong (multiplied the euros by 10 to get the dongs)

Ok I have a question, if a balanced team with weaker midfield has to go against another not-so-balanced team with stronger midfield, then what should that team do, putting wingers TW and losing wing attack but will gain more possession? or else?

Well, my opinion is that possession is still very important in Hattrick, so my first goal when I prepare my tactic for the match, is to see how can I get ball possession...
So my opinion is that it's better to loose a side attack, if this can help You getting more ball possession...
And don't think that is a not equilibrate team, because it is equilibrated for the kind of team You are going to play against...

::)


/TheGuardian